|
Introduction to Temporary Spiritual Gifts
BD27-01© Berean Memorial Church of Irving, Texas, Inc. (1971)
This morning we are going to look at the introduction to
temporary spiritual gifts. We have found
that every Christian has been given certain permanent spiritual
abilities as a means to performing Christian service. Many
Christians use them and many do not use their spiritual gifts. We have that there are three guidelines to
using your spiritual gifts. One was that
you had a desire to perform a specific spiritual service. Secondly, there was a recognition on the part
of others that you do have this gift. The
third guideline is the evidence of fruitfulness and the blessing
from the exercise of that gift. You
should not look for a spectacular desire. You
should not look for spectacular recognition. And
you should not look for spectacular evidence. Or you will be
led astray and discouraged, and come to the point where you think you have no
spiritual gift. You have at least
one, and you may have more. But God will
propel you in the right direction with a heart that’s open to receive that
direction, and he will give confirmation within your own heart, within the results, and
within what others receive through the use of your gift.
Now obviously this is the core of Christian service, and
this is what it’s all about, then anytime we talk about this
subject, I know that it’s going to have an edge of discouragement to certain
people, and I’ve already received that reaction from some of you, because you throw your
hands up and you say, “Man, I can’t see myself anywhere
in any of those things. I’m the one exception—no gift. I’m
the giftless Christian.” Well, there are no giftless Christians,
really. You have to eventually understand that, or you will be discouraged.
So, this being the core of what is the vehicle of Christian
service, naturally you may expect that Satan is going to discourage,
and Satan is going to work on spiritual gifts. This
is why the average church is a non-functioning operation, because
they have a professional that they’ve hired to be the
preacher and the administrator, and the rest of the people sit there as spectators as in
a football stadium, cheering him on to perform certain spiritual
functions, and to reach certain spiritual goals. But
God’s program is for the body to be prepared so that the body
can minister to itself. You don’t need the pastor. The
time comes when you don’t even need to go
to the pastor for anything. The time
will come when you will be so versed in Biblical doctrinal principals
that the answers will well up in your own being, and you will become an
indigenous Christian, functioning on your own, and a useful believer to those
around you.
Please remember that the permanent gifts are not designed
for self-edification. They are not
designed to edify yourself, but they are designed to build up the other
believers. So, naturally Satan is going to hit spiritual
gifts. This is the one thing he is going to keep people ignorant on. He’s
going to do two things. He’s going to keep you
in ignorance concerning spiritual gifts, which is the opening statement
of the apostle Paul in 1 Corinthians 12, “Brother, I would not have
you ignorant concerning the spiritual gifts.” And
Satan is going to keep you diluted concerning gifts that no longer
exist. Satan will discourage you from using your
spiritual gifts, which do exist, on the one hand, and he will encourage
you to try to use, to seek, to attain temporary gifts which are no longer
functioning. And we have a vast realm of
Christians who are running up a blind alley seeking temporary gifts
which were phased out in the early period of the New Testament church, and they
are completely oblivious to the permanent gifts which they do have and
through which God could accomplish great things.
So, I’m trying to alert you this morning that Satan is after
you relative to your functioning as a believer. And
the only way you can serve the Lord is through these spiritual
gifts. If you try to serve the Lord through your natural abilities, you’re wasting your time.
We found that there are certain things that neutralize the
use of the spiritual gift. This is part of Satan’s plan of attack. In
our previous study, we suggested several hazards that can neutralize your
spiritual gifts, and there may be certainly others. One
hazard was using your gift in the wrong geographic location—being in
the wrong place. Somebody last week at the evening service handed me an address and said,
“We’re moving.” They had just moved here not so long ago—just
a matter of weeks. They said, “The company is moving us back. What can we
do?” Well, the person is kind of new, but I wanted to say, “Well, when the company tells you where
you can go, you can tell the company where they can go too, with your job.” She
said, “We hate it. We want to stay here. This is where we want to be. Keep in touch with us.”
Another hazard was using your gift on a temporary
basis. You come to a time when you decide you should retire from using your gift. There
is no such thing in the Word of God. If you have a gift, you are to use it as long
as there is blood flowing in your veins and breath in your body. It
will be commensurate with your age, that’s true, but the gift will continue to function.
Or you may put it in the wrong situation. You may be using a splendid gift, but you may
be using it in the wrong type of ministry. Then there was using your gift for personal glory. Or
using you gift independently of spiritual leaders. An attitude like, “If I’m going
to do it, I’m going to be in charge.” Or using natural abilities and calling them spiritual gifts. Now
God does use our natural abilities, I think. He sanctifies these abilities,
and I think they come under that gift of ministering.
However, Satan deception through temporary gifts is the
thing we are going to direct our attention to now, because Satan loves
to play this kind of game. If we, as believers,
are to function fruitfully in the plan of God, with our spiritual
gifts, then we have to understand our spiritual heritage in the church age. This
is what is often lost to us—our spiritual heritage in the church age. It
takes time and effort for a Christian to become informed so that he has
doctrinal good judgment. This is what a pastor-teacher is concerned about, that his flock has doctrinal good
judgment. It is distressing when you find God’s sheep with bad doctrinal judgment, because then
they are patsies for every Satanic wind and drift and emotional pitch that comes along. Some
people attend church for a long time and they never make it to the point where they have doctrinal good judgment.
Satan is extremely clever in keep the sheep in spiritual
ignorance and operating on emotion binges of purported Christian
service. So, this is a concern. You will have noticed Bible writers are
always concerned that God’s people are in ignorance because
then they are exposed to the hazard of emotion manipulation by Satan.
So, Satan invents many ways to drain you who are sincere and
even you who are informed believers of your spiritual zeal so as to
remove you from the Lord’s service. I can tell you
again that without doctrine in your mind, you become open to satanic
manipulation through your emotions, and then you are guided by your
emotions in your actions. Christianity will then for
you be converted into a series of happiness kicks. You
will be looking for things to make you happy, so that you can get up and glow and ooze and exude all the
warmth and the happiness of your Christianity, and you are off on an emotional
kick. You will move with people who gather in services for express purposes of pitching a happiness kick.
Now this condition plays right into the hands of Satan because it will neutralize your permanent gifts. It
sends believers after temporary gifts that they can never achieve, and thus neutralizes what they could do with
the permanent gifts. Christian service becomes a series of things to charge your emotions.
I have noticed that in Pentecostal groups which do pursue a
charge of emotion, and which every service is geared to this, that
there is a sense of spirituality. I had it pointed up to me again this week. There is a
sense of spirituality that is structured on separation. And you can walk in your Pentecostal church
(generally it has been my experience, but I wouldn’t say it always has been the
case), and there is a certain very rigid devoted separation from things
that they consider unspiritual. It will be
noted, for example, in the fact that the ladies don’t dress
very stylishly. It will also be noticed that
there’s an absence of makeup, and you get the feeling that
you’re with a bunch of “plain Janes.” This
connotes a spiritual quality, or spirituality.
But there has been an incongruity that I have never been
able to relate. That is that I also
notice that in the Pentecostal circles, the music seems what would be
considered most unspiritual. It’s of the Las Vegas
nightclub, belting it out, heavy beat, bordering on the rock type of
music. You hear it on radio and TV, but
it is something else to sit in a church service where there is this
rigid spirituality in evidence, and you just feel it by the way people act,
and the words they use, and the expressions they use, and the
“praises of the Lord,” the “hallelujahs,” and the
“amens” that are shouted—which is OK if
you want to do that, but don’t think that makes you spiritual.
But I mean a ladies’ trio will get up and they will
literally belt it out. It will be jumping and the pianist is there jumping along and jiving the thing up,
and the music is belting it out, and it’s loud, and it’s
raucous, and they’re happy, and they’re smiling. Of course, they
use the microphone to give it a professional touch. There’s
a lot of movement and all of the people on the platform are
tapping their feet, and pretty soon the place is jumping. And
it’s the same kind of music that you find
nightclub singers singing, belting it out in the same way.
Finally, it hit me. That kind of music lends itself to giving your emotions a happiness
kick. The gal on the Las Vegas strip is
singing to those drunks and non-drunks to make them happy, for the
money they’ve spent. She’s singing to kick
their emotions into a moment of joy. And
that’s exactly what happens in a church service that is
geared to the emotions, minus doctrine to guide the mind.
So, Satan comes along and knows how to manipulate this area
in order to frustrate any useful Christian service. It
is interesting that the people who pursue
temporary gifts, such as tongues and healing and so on that are
non-existent today, are the people who have a rigid spirituality and music that is
incongruous with what people would consider spiritual music.
Now I’m not against happiness music. I’m
known as one of the last of the big time blues boys myself with the beat. Anytime
that I take over the choir, there’s a noticeable difference
in the style of the music. It gets moving and beating out
there a little bit. But this is something distinctively different. The
fact that we enjoy music that has a melody and a joyous note to it does
not mean that we are trying to serve the Lord by feeding the emotions, and
that’s what the services are designed to do in Pentecostal groups.
Dealing with Controversy
However, you can go to the other end of the spectrum where
you have the most respected of religious leaders. I
read the quotation of a prominent college
religious leader this week, concerning the temporary gift of tongues. He
was asked by a college student who was
concerned about this business of tongues, and this is a big problem on
college campuses today. The college leader said,
“We don’t discuss the tongues movement with the
pastors. I personally do not speak in tongues, but I
don’t criticize those who do. The Bible
tells me that they are my brothers in Christ, and I am to love them, and I do.”
The very phrase that he used, “I do not criticize,” is
to be explained if you understand doctrine. The reason he
doesn’t criticize such a monstrous fraud as speaking in
tongues is because he is weak on doctrine. Criticism
of false doctrine and of Christian love are not mutually
exclusive if you understand what the word means. Love
is a mental attitude free of ill will. I can listen to
some Christian who is just as off in left field on some point as he can be, and I can say,
“Buddy, you are wrong. That is false doctrine. That is not sound
doctrine.” And I don’t have any ill will
toward him whatsoever because I tell him he is wrong.
Now this is a subtle inane suggestion that if you criticize
something that is frightfully doctrinally wrong, that you’re
not loving the person that you’re calling down upon on it. The
same leader’s wife, in a magazine this last week, said, in
describing the nature of the work of her and her husband among college
students, “We are not against anything. We are simply for a lot of things.”
Now that is a sad remark. I have heard Christians say this. I have something that must have been
akin to the feeling of Samuel when he saw Saul going negative, and Samuel spent
the night weeping. When Christians have
said this to me, I have had something akin to that feeling of sadness
because this is the biggest fattest piece of human viewpoint, strictly from
Satan, and usually picked up from other disoriented Christians. “I
am not against anything. I am just for a lot of things.”
Now how can you be for anything unless you are definitively
against the opposite of that thing? That’s
politician talk, to say “I’m not against anything. I’m
just for a lot of things.” Just
listen to the political debates on TV. Some
reporter puts a pointed question to a
political candidate. He’s just as
evasive and squirmy and squiggly as he can be. You
get the distinct impression that this candidate is not against the
things he’s opposed to, and he’s not in favor of
the things he’s for. He’s just middle-of-the-road. Now what could be nicer than that?
Now this is not divine viewpoint. Anytime a Christian, “I’m through being
against things. I’m just going to be for
things,” start weeping inside, because somebody has led him
down the blind alley of the primrose path. It’s
just going to be disastrous in his own spiritual life and expression. This
is Satan’s way of countering your effectiveness.
If you apply this concept to the ministry of the Lord Jesus
Christ, in His attitude toward the religious leaders of His day,
you’re going to have some trouble. The Lord Jesus
Christ spoke out so strongly against false doctrine and false
practices, even among the leaders of His day, that they killed Him for it. In
my opinion, that is exactly the reason people make this remark, “We’re not against
anything. We’re just for a lot of things,” it’s because
they are members of an organization that has now developed to a level
of national prestige and prominence that they don’t want to be
“killed” by dealing with controversial issues and being definitive in doctrine. In
fact, they want to avoid being “killed” so
badly, as an organization that they will compromise with false doctrine.
That’s the real meaning behind this remark. The organization leadership feels that it
must retain financial support and it must retain participation in its
program. An organization can start of in a small way
and be extremely significant in the Lord’s work, with great
fruitfulness. Then it expands to a national scale and comes
to a point of prominence. Then it is
naturally sustained by great financial backing and the participation of
vast numbers of people. In order to keep
the money flowing and in order to keep the participation going, they begin
to become less definitive on doctrine. I
have seen this again and again and again with organizations that were
serving a great purpose, and then when they became big-time, they began to hedge
on doctrine in order to maintain their big-time status, and that is wrong.
If the organization is doing God’s work, if God has called
it, if God has made it big-time and He chooses to make it small-time
again, then so be it. But you don’t play loose with false doctrine. And once you
decide that you need to maintain the level of patronage necessary to maintain
the level of expansion, you will find it expedient not to be definitive on doctrine, so you will avoid controversy.
It is interesting that a college student came to this same leader with a question about tongues. He
said, “I can’t answer that question. It’s such a controversial issue that we, in our organization, do not
discuss it.” Now can you see the Lord
doing that to a positive inquirer who came and asked Him? Never. Anybody who was
positive to the truth and came and asked the Lord a
question, he was positive that he got the truth in answer.
A college girl recently wrote me and asked me about this
issue because it is such a raging controversy on college campuses. I
sat down and wrote her over a three-page
single-spaced type-written letter and answer, in a brief summary on
this problem. And I don’t write three-paged single-spaced letters to my sons. But
I did to this girl because I knew a little bit about our situation, and
she moves in college circles. This has become a major problem with her because she thinks she’s had
experiences that she’s not really had, and she ought to be informed that her life can be destroy
and her life can be destroyed.
I have no problem whatsoever in sitting down and discussing
this controversial issue. And I don’t
care how big your organization is, you do not play with false doctrine,
and you do not condone it. This college leader
is not doing the right thing by avoiding confrontation and discussion
of the issue of tongues, which has permeated this organization and has caused
some problems within it as well, although this leader does not speak in
tongues, though he is opposed to it, though he does not permit it within his
organization. If you think he is doing the right thing by avoiding taking a stand relative to the tongues
movement and the temporary nature of this gift, then you’re going to have
problems with the Paul. It was the apostle Paul who said, “Beware of Alexander the coppersmith. He
opposed the Word of God. He did me dirt, and he’ll hurt you” (2 Timothy 4:14-15).
You’ll have problems with this same apostle Paul who said, “Demas has gone carnal.” Demas
got he wanted—prestige, this whole world system and all that it had to offer, and the lusts of
his old sin nature went forward. Demas said, “I’m through being against for things. I’m
going to be for things.” In 2 Timothy 4:10, the apostle Paul says, “Demas has left
me,” and you can hear the ring of sadness of another person that Paul has clearly identified as
going down the line being for things and not against things.
The worst of all that you have with the apostle Paul is in
Galatians 2:11-14 where he describes a situation with the apostle Peter. Paul
gets up in a church service and he confronts the apostle Peter face-to-face before all the believers
because Peter was promoting legalism. Peter wouldn’t
sit down and eat with a Gentile. He wouldn’t have anything to do with Gentiles because the other
Jewish Christians were criticizing his interrelationship with Gentiles. Here
the apostle Paul and gets up and confronts “the first pope, Peter.” Paul
gets up and says, “You were wrong and I rebuke you for your
legalism.” Now, Peter wasn’t really “the first
pope.” I said that in a meeting one time
and I had fifteen people come to me afterward and say, “I
didn’t know he was the first pope.” So, I want to
clear that up now. But he certainly was the number
one man on the totem pole, of the 12. And here Paul
says to this leader, “You’re wrong, Peter,” because
legalism is as vicious a thing as these temporary gifts functioning today. It was satanic.
So, you’re going to have a problem if you don’t like
taking a stand on controversial issues, relative to sound doctrine. I
like what Galatians 2:5 says, with the apostle Paul summarizing what we have been saying. Paul’s
expression is dealing with people who opposed him. Paul says, “And that
because of false brethren, unawares brought in, who came in secretly to
spy out our liberty that we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into
bondage, to whom we gave place by subjection, no not for an hour, that
the truth of the gospel might continue with you.”
Now that doesn’t sound to me like a religious leader
who’s not against anything, but only for things. It
doesn’t sound to me like a religious leader who says,
“Well I’m not going to get into controversial discussions with other Christian
leaders. I’m just going to be sweetness and
light.” Paul say, “I didn’t give ground
to these who were delivering false doctrine—not for an
hour.” You will find no other attitude in the Word
of God. But when your organization gets
big, and you decide that you’re going to have to keep the
money flowing, and the participation going, you are through right there. Once
money and participation in your organization becomes important, Satan has you. You
will do anything to accommodate yourself to false doctrine.
So, we look now at temporary gifts, which Satan uses to send
emotionally dominated Christians down blind alleys of religious
activities for happiness kicks, but which do not produce any diving good. We’re
moving toward the most dramatic and controversial temporary gifts—miracle working, healings, and
tongues. That’s on the docket for the next couple of Sundays. This morning we begin with temporary gifts.
The Gift of Apostles
Number one is apostles. In Ephesians 4:11, this gift is listed. The Greek word is
“apostolos.” The first part of this word “apo” means “from.” The
second part of the word comes from the verb “stolo” which means to send. So
this word literally means “one who is sent forth,”
that is, a messenger. In the New Testament, the word “apostle” has
three different uses. It is important that you distinguish these three uses of the word
“apostle.” It will help you to avoid the error that some
make today who claim that we do have apostles today.
First, the word “apostle” is used of the twelve. 1
Corinthians 15:5 speaks of the twelve as being apostles. There are certain
requirements to qualify for what is known as being of the
twelve—that particular group of apostles. The
qualifications are two-fold and they are listed in Acts 1. The
first one, beginning at verse 21, “Wherefore of these men who have accompanied with us all the
time that the Lord Jesus went out among us, beginning with the baptism of John unto that
same day when He was taken up from us. That was requirement number one. To be an
apostle, to qualify for the group of the twelve, you had to accompany
the Lord Jesus on His earthly ministry from the baptism of John until the ascension.
Secondly, to qualify for the twelve, in the last part of
verse 22, one “must be ordained to be a witness with Him of
His resurrection.” Secondly, to be qualified
an apostle qualified to be of the twelve, you had to be an eye witness
of the resurrected of the Lord Jesus Christ. For this reason,
the apostle could not qualify to be one of the twelve. For while he saw
the Lord Jesus in resurrection on the Damascus road, he did not accompany the Lord
during His earthly ministry from the baptism of John to the ascension. These
two requirements qualify for one type of apostleship. This is the apostleship of the twelve. Nobody can qualify for
this gift, obviously today, for we have nobody today who can meet these two prerequisites.
Secondly, the word “apostle” refers to a special apostleship
such as Paul and James possessed (Galatians 1:19, 1 Corinthians 1:1). These
men had seen the Lord Jesus Christ in resurrection glory. James, who was a
half-brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, was an unbeliever until after
his resurrection. He was not accompanying the Lord in His earthly ministry. But
they did qualify on the account of having seen Jesus Christ in
resurrection. They could testify to the reality of the resurrection. Obviously,
again, nobody qualifies for this type of apostleship today. We
do not have anybody in this room who can
stand up and say, “I have the gift of apostle, and I qualify
by the fact that I have seen Jesus Christ in resurrection.”
The third type of apostleship refers to messengers of the
church in general. 2 Corinthians 8:23 speaks of this type of apostleship. It
speaks about the messengers of the churches. It uses exactly
the same Greek word “apostolos,” but it uses it in
a non-technical sense. In the case of the
twelve, and in the case of the special apostleship of Paul and James,
it had a technical meaning. It does not have
a technical meaning when it speaks of them here as messengers of the
churches. You are to distinguish between these two: being a messenger
of Christ, an apostle of Christ, and to be an apostle of the churches is two
different things.
We have men such as Barnabas in Acts 14:14 who were apostles
in the sense that they were messengers of the churches. Barnabas
is not said to have seen the Lord in resurrection. He does not have
the technical of the apostleship. Epaphroditus, in
Philippians 2:25 is another one who is called a
messenger, an apostle, of the churches. The word simply
means “a sent one,” sent on a mission by a local
church, but this is not a spiritual gift.
Now what is an apostle to do? Well, the twelve laid the foundation of the
church, and they led the early expressions of the church (Ephesians
2:20, Acts 62-4). Qualifications for the apostolic
gift make it impossible for anybody to possess it today. There
is no such thing as apostolic succession. Some churches say
that they pass on the apostleship—the twelve passed on their
apostleship by laying hands on twelve other men, and they passed it on, etc., and that we have
today therefore apostles who have been given this gift through the laying on of hands
of other apostles. But this is a spiritual gift, and we have learned that a spiritual gift is only given by God the Holy
Spirit. I can’t give you a spiritual gift, and you can’t give one to me. Nobody
qualifies—there is no such thing as apostolic succession.
So, an apostle had this kind of authority in the
church—supreme authority over all the local churches. As
apostle could walk into any local church
and his authority was supreme in that church. This
is not true today. Within one local church, there is the executive head of the pastor-teacher
authority, and his authority extends only over that congregation, and not beyond
it to some other congregation.
The apostles were the instruments of divine revelation. They
were used to produce the New Testament Scriptures. So, today the
canon is closed, and this gift is ceased.
There were two periods of apostolic ministry. 1) Before Pentecost, they announced the
messianic kingdom, they presented Jesus Christ as the King of the Jews,
and they preached them to Jews only, and they are to sit in the millennial
kingdom as judges over the twelve tribes relative to this relationship that
they had with Israel. 2) But after Pentecost they had a different service as apostles. They
laid the foundation truths relative to the church age. They
preached the gospel of grace, and then they taught to Jews and Gentiles alike.
The apostles were a primary source of divine revelation that
prepared and wrote for us the New Testament Scriptures.
The Gift of Prophecy
A second temporary gift was that of prophet. In Ephesians 4:11, you have the word
“prophetes,” and this means one who speaks for, or
speaks openly. The Greeks used to use this word to describe a
man who delivered the oracles of their gods. They called him a
“prophetes.” He spoke and delivered the messages from their gods. It
connotes, therefore, proclaiming some kind of divine message. It’s a
communications gift. In Romans 12:6 and 1 Corinthians
12: 10, we have the word “prophetia.” The
first part “pro” means for. The second
part comes from a verb meaning “to speak.” So, this means one who is speaking for.
These were men who proclaimed a message from God, such as
the apostles did. John, the apostle, had
the gift of apostle, and he had the gift of prophet. What
these men said was something that could not be known by natural means. It could
only be known by supernatural information given to them (Amos 3:7-8, 1
Peter 1:21). These were holy men that God Himself moved with information He gave them.
What was the ministry of the prophet? Well, before the New Testament Scriptures
were written, they communicated the mind of God to the people (Act
11:27-28, Acts 21:10-11, Acts 21:9). The prophet received doctrine, and he received predictions about the
future—direct revelations from God, which he delivered to the believers in the assembly.
Why did they have a prophet? Well, obviously, there was no complete Bible. There were no
New Testament Scriptures written. The only way that God could
inform them was by somebody having the gift of prophet. He
stood up and he declared to that group the mind of God. He made
predictions concerning the future which he could not know—the distance
future, which he could never know except that God gave him this information. There
were no Bibles to open when they sat in church. They had to have information
from God through a communicator, and that was the prophet.
Now, obviously, these communications are all recorded for us
now in the New Testament Scriptures. So, they are completed, and the gift of prophecy has ceased. The
gift was to build up the believer spiritually (1 Corinthians 14:4).
Now these revelations from God to the prophets were of two
kinds. We call one foretelling, which is
predicting the future (Micah 5:2, Revelation 22:7, 10). A
true prophet who exercised his gift of
prediction was always right. As a matter
of fact, if somebody in this group this morning stood up and said,
“I believe I have the gift of prophecy,” how would we check him out? The
Bible says one way. You say, “Make the prediction—a distant
prediction of something you could not know or something that you
can’t just reason that may likely happen.” Then
if we see that your prediction is fulfilled, we find that you indeed have
confirmed to us that you are a prophet to be listened to. That’s
the way they listened to a prophet, when he proved himself with a
prediction. So, nobody can have the gift of prophecy today because nobody can prove himself by predicting.
Foretelling was the important basic segment of the prophet’s
ministry. Nobody is able to do this today because the gift has ceased. However,
the prophet also did some “forthtelling.” He
was declaring God’s viewpoint relative to
some current situation or some current issue in the church. This
gift was again exercised before the Scriptures were produced, and nobody is able to deliver messages from
God today.
If you were in Pentecostal meetings, this is part of what
you would hear. You would hear a person
getting up, and of course tongues are used as a vehicle for delivering
revelations from God. You would have
people standing up and saying, “I am a prophet,”
and they would deliver messages from God, and you would be obliged to believe that this is a
revelation from God. Well, Revelation 22:18-19 speaks about the book of Revelation itself, but it lays out a
principal that I think is applicable to all of Scriptures. It
warns anybody who takes away or adds to the book of Revelation. It’s a
completed canon of Scripture. I think the principal applies to the whole New Testament.
In the New Testament, the gift of prophecy operated. But
when the New Testament Scriptures were completed, the gift ceased. 1
Corinthians 13:8-9 tells us that very thing was going to happen.
So, the role of the prophet in forthtelling has been
discontinued. Who has taken it over? We still need to
know what God thinks about a certain situation. Has
God now left us in the local church without somebody to stand up and
say, “Now here’s what God thinks” upon this subject, to give
us a direction? No, He has not left us. Since we have a
completed Scripture, what He has now given us are pastor-teachers who take over this gift, and even
teachers who take over this gift on the basis of teaching the Scriptures. They
give us doctrine which gives us guidance as to what God thinks in a situation.
In Ephesians 2:20, the prophet is placed after the apostle
in order to clarify that they are New Testament spiritual gifts. We’re
not talking about Old Testament prophets. It says we are
given apostles, and some are prophets, etc., because these are New Testament prophets. 2
Peter 2:1 declares to us that the gift of forthtelling has been taken over by the permanent gift of teaching.
The message of the prophet is a direct revelation of the
mind of God about the present as well as the future, while the message
of the teacher is derived from the completed canon of Scripture. That’s
the difference. The prophet got his message directly from God, and the teacher gets his from the Word of God.
The Gift of Wisdom
Another temporary gift is the gift of wisdom. We don’t have too much information about this
one. We have it in 1 Corinthians 12:8. The Greek word is “sophia.” The word denotes
a quality, not an activity. It connotes an unusual insight
and an unusual ability to understand, and it’s listed among
the temporary gift when it is listed, so it’s probably a temporary gift. Apparently
it had to do with the spiritual ability of viewing some situation in life from divine viewpoint. Again,
it was necessary to have this gift of wisdom to see things the way God sees them before we had the frame of
reference of Scripture. This included being able
to see the failures in a situation, and to be able to give spiritual
counsel so that the failures are corrected, just as we use doctrine to give
spiritual counsel now to correct the failures. This
was the ability to see things the way God sees them. We
now provide this to the New Testament Scriptures. That apparently was the gift of wisdom.
The Gift of Knowledge
The gift of knowledge is another temporary gift, and we have
very little information about this one. This
seems to refer to an investigation, or a seeking to know
something. It denotes an activity with definite results. It’s
associated in the list of temporary gifts, so we view it as a temporary gift. It
seems to have been a spiritual ability to take a revelation and to give it a proper doctrinal classification. You
have to apply doctrine according to the categories in which that doctrine fits. If
you don’t understand doctrinal categories, you won’t
understand a particular doctrine and its uses. Before
the New Testament canon was formed, so that they had a frame of
reference, they had to have people in the church who had this gift of knowledge who had
to know how to inform and interpret, to bring this revelation
together—bringing the pieces together so that they had the complete picture of what God was saying.
Now the propositions of spiritual truth are scattered all
through the New Testament, and they have to be brought together for a
full picture of the implications of any particular doctrine.
The Gift of Discernment
There is one final temporary gift we’re going to look at
today, and that’s the discerning of spirits. The Greek word
is “diakrisis.” This means being able to determine true differences. It connotes
reaching a decision on the basis of evidence, as to whether a thing is
good or evil. Spirits probably refers to human spirits. It’s
being able to discern concerning the person who is standing up and teaching you, whether this
human spirit who is delivering the mind of God or whether he is delivering
the mind of Satan. Again, this gift was very necessary before we had the New Testament Scriptures to show us
doctrine. How would we know when somebody stands up and
starts giving us instruction in the assembly, giving us a viewpoint,
whether this person is a true prophet or a false prophet—whether he
is delivering to us divine viewpoint, or whether he is cranking out some human viewpoint
that seems very appealing and very plausible? There is no way we could know. When we listen
to somebody who makes a statement, we need a way to determine whether
what he’s saying is true or false. That’s what I
was trying to show you in the introduction today. People
with great prestige and great prominence will make statements. How
do you know that they are speaking divine viewpoint or human viewpoint? The
only way you could concern which is of the Spirit of God and which is by the spirit of Satan is by the Word of God.
Now before we had doctrine in the New Testament, God had to
supply us with something else, and that was the provision of the person
who had the gift of discerning spirits. He could
get up and say, “Don’t listen to him. God
has at this moment indicated to me that that’s false doctrine. That’s
human viewpoint that he has delivered to us.”
So, this gift has ceased today. We don’t have anybody who can spot true and
false on the basis of a direct statement of God. We have people, such as yourselves, who are
informed in doctrine, who can spot true and false on the basis of Scripture. The Holy Spirit
indwells every Christian to teach all divine truths of doctrine, through the
instrumentality of a pastor-teacher, who illuminates the Scriptures and then shows, by
the Scriptures, what is error and what is truth (1 John 2:27). And
Christians are to test with Scripture every instruction that they receive from the pastor-teacher or anybody
else. They are to verify that instruction as divine viewpoint (1 John 4:1). You
can do that today because you have the New Testament Scriptures. However,
people in the early church did not have a Bible to carry to church with them. They
had no frame of reference. They needed somebody who had the gift of discerning true and false human
spirits, as to what they were instructing and what they were delivering to the people of God.
Here are five temporary gifts. You may think through these now, at your leisure:
The gift of apostle was a foundational gift upon which the
church has been built. It was a gift of
supreme authority in the New Testament church; a gift used to write the
New Testament Scriptures; and, a gift which required associations with the
Lord Jesus Christ—an eye witness of his resurrection. This gift has ceased.
The person with the gift of prophecy was not only able to
apply revelation to a current situation—revelation received
directly from God, but who also could predict the future, and he was always right. He was never wrong.
The word of wisdom was being able to give counsel and
direction to show where the failure lies.
The word of knowledge was the ability to take Scripture and
to put it in its right classification so that you know what this
particular point of doctrine is telling us relative to its implications. Here’s
what Christians often miss from the Word—the implications of the Word. The
implications are what constitute our involvement with the Word.
Finally, the gift of discerning of Spirits was the ability
to sense when a person is bringing viewpoint and when he is bringing false human viewpoint.
All of these gifts have now ceased. You can see that their purpose and function
was absolutely necessary when we did not have the New Testament Bible. Once
we had the New Testament Scriptures, these gifts were phased out.
Next time, we begin with an extensive examination of the
gift of miracles.
John E. Danish 1971
Back to the Basic Bible Doctrine index
Back to the Bible Questions index |