|
Grace Giving
The Grace Way of Giving, No. 6
BD35-02© Berean Memorial Church of Irving, Texas, Inc. (1971)
We are studying 2 Corinthians 8 as we pick up the exposition of these two major chapters concerning giving for Christians under
grace. We pick it you this morning at verse 10. We’re going to look at
verses 10 through 15. In these verses, the apostle Paul
takes up directly the Corinthians, and their performance and their part
relative to this special fund which has been being gathered for the
relief of the saints in Jerusalem.
2 Corinthians 8:10-15
Verse 10 says, “And in this I give my advice, for this is expedient for you who have begun before, not only to do but also to be
willing a year ago.” The Corinthians had a desire, and “in this” refers to the subject of the context,
that is, their giving to this Jerusalem relief fund. The Jews in Jerusalem who were believers were under
persecution. They were under great financial pressure and they were in great need. Therefore, Paul
was promoting among the Gentiles of the New Testament world a sympathetic
offering for a relieving of the pressure and of the financial need upon the Jerusalem believers.
Paul has been talking about this relative to the performance
of the Macedonian churches, and the example of grace giving that they
were. Now Paul says, “In this thing that I’ve been speaking about (that is, this special offering) I give
you my advice.” In verse 7 he had urged upon
these people giving commensurate with their high level of functioning
under the grace system of receiving spiritual things. In verse 8 Paul has urged support of the fund
because of their genuine love for God. In verse 9, Jesus Christ
on the cross is presented as the ultimate example of grace giving which
Paul is urging upon the Corinthians.
Paul’s Opinion
So, he says, “Relative to this whole subject of giving to
this particular fund, I have some advice to give you.” The word for “advice” is
“gnome” in the Greek. This word has the connotation of
mind. It means a deliberate opinion. It is in contrast to that word
up in verse 8, the word “commandment,” where Paul says,
“I’m not commanding you to give.” Here he is saying,
“I’m giving you my mind. I’m giving you my
thinking, but it is in the form of a judgment. It’s my opinion.” Again
his point is, “I am not giving you a command. You
can never command people when it comes to Christian giving.
Paul’s advice comes however from a mind that knows what he’s
talking about. Paul isn’t getting up and
saying, “Now, Corinthian Christians, I feel that you should do
this. I feel that because of this and this and
this.” He’s not giving some emotional
appeal relative to the disaster and the sufferings that he could
picture for them of the saints in Jerusalem. But on
the basis of these doctrinal principles of grace giving, Paul who
understands grace, who understands doctrine says, “Now I have an opinion. I have a judgment to give you.”
Sometimes you might be inclined to go to want to go to some Christian for advice.
That can be very very dangerous. It is well for you to remember that most
Christians are very hazardous sources of guidance. You better make sure that the opinions that
these people give you are opinions that come from a mentality that is saturated
with God’s viewpoint. There are Christians who can lead you far astray from the mind of God.
So, when the apostle Paul comes along and says, “Now I’ve got
an opinion to give you,” he is giving this on the basis of a mind
that is oriented to God’s thinking. You be
very careful about how wide a circle of Christians you trust; whose opinions
you will cast the course of your life on; and, whose fellowship you will
enter into such depths that they will be influential upon the things you do and
the things you enter into. Unless they really know
the Lord, and unless they are sharp in doctrine, they’ll hurt you
because they’re operating on their emotions, and the apostle Paul is our
example in advice that’s worth listening to.
Paul says, “I give my advice. I’m giving you my mind. As a spiritual leader I cannot command you to
give.” Any giving which is in response
to demands, to threats, to intimidation, to humiliate, or to emotion is
not grace giving, and it is not acceptable to God. Only a free people can practice grace giving, and
you as a priest of God are in a free priesthood. Now God gives
salvation in grace. No one demanded of God that salvation, or could demand of Him. Because
he gives in grace, we give in grace.
So, Paul says, “I have some advice to give you concerning
this matter of giving to God and your handling your money, for this is
expedient for you. “Expedient” is the
Greek word “sumphero.” This word means
“advantageous” or “profitable.” What is
profitable? “For this” refers to their
giving in this offering. This is what is profitable for you.
“Who have begun before not only to do but also to be
willing.” “Who have begun before,” and
this word “who” is the Greek word “hostis.”
This is a word that indicates “quality.” “You people
who are of such a quality. You Corinthians who are of such a spiritual quality
that you have begun a certain offering.” The Corinthians
were of a quality that they were ready to begin this offering to the
Jerusalem relief fund. “You have begun this before,” that is, in the time past. He
refers to a prior beginning. In the context here it means sometime previous to the time that he is writing.
Under the leadership of Titus they began this offering. It’s in the middle voice.
This means that they were the instigators of this offering themselves.
He said they were not only the instigators sometime before
this offering of which he now speaks to them, but they were not only to
do but also to be willing. You might read that and think that seems to be backward. He
should say to be willing and then to do. But he says “do” first, and then to be
willing. Well, the word “do” is the Greek word “poieo.” This
simply means “to do something” or “to accomplish something.” This word is
in the aorist tense which means a point in the past when they began to
take that offering. It’s active voice. That is, they are voluntarily choosing
to do this. It’s in the infinitive mood which means it’s a purpose. These
people purposed to do something. Furthermore, it says that they were willing, and the word “willing” is
“thelo.” This word means “to be willing to choose” or
“to desire” to do this. And this is present tense.
Now here’s something to notice: When it came to doing, the desire to do was
there. The year before they said, “We want to give.” They made a decision
and they started an offering. A year has passed and they have not completed the offering. In
fact, it came to a dead standstill. But something did not change. Their desire is
present tense which meant it continued. They still had the desire to
give to the Lord though they were at this point not giving to the Lord. Their desire to give to the Jerusalem relief
fund had continued even though the doing had ceased. So, they were in the state of wanting to give
but not doing it. Something was causing them to neglect this.
Here’s an interesting point for you and me as believer
priests: Those of us who are oriented to the Word of God and who understand grace giving are always going to be
in the present tense on our desire to give. You’re going to want to give to the Lord even
when you’re broke. As a matter of fact, you’ll be wanting to
give to the Lord even when you do not give for one reason or another. You may find in your heart a perfect desire
to give to the Lord, but you don’t give to Him because
you’re making too much money. As you look over that wedge of
your expanding income and the chunk of proportionate expanding giving
to God, it hurts you to think that you would give God so much more than once
you gave when you were a mere tither. Or you don’t come to church very often, and your pattern of giving is
such that when you’re in church, you give. When you’re
not, you don’t. Naturally, that makes sense, doesn’t it? After all if you
don’t stay for the show you shouldn’t pay for it. When you come to the performance, you
pay. When you don’t come to the performance, you don’t pay. What
could be more reasonable?” What could be more reasonable? And there are Christians who
give on that basis. But even when they’re not here for the performance, they’re perfectly
willing to give. They have this desire to give, but the doing is something else.
This is what was true of the Corinthians. They had a perfect desire to
give to the Lord, as most of us do. But the doing,
that they did not continually have. There was the point of the breakdown. For one reason or another, they were not coming
through with the money that God had entrusted to them. Giving
expresses our love for the Lord, and a quality of love which is genuine
and has about it this continuous factor. This is
just like a right woman will always want to give herself to her right
man, whether she does or not, but the desire is always there. So, a believer who is in a right relationship
to the Lord through the Word and has that affectionate expression
toward God will always have a desire to give though he may break down and fail in his performance.
So, Paul says, concerning this special offering, “I give my
advice (based on my doctrinal orientation), for it is profitable for
you (this performance in this offering), who have begun before not only to do
(that you made a determination), but you have continued to have the desire
(though your doing has ceased) a year ago.”
In verse 11 the apostle gives his advice: “Now therefore perform (the
doing of it), for as there was a readiness to will so there will be a performance also
out of that which ye have.” “Now therefore” is
a conclusion, and it uses the word “nuni” for the word
“now.” It is a strong word connoting no more
delay. Paul said, “OK, the desire is there. The point of decision was there
in the past. You have stopped. Now let’s get started again to the
performing, the doing of it, the completing of this offering.” The word “performing” here is
“epiteleo,” meaning “completion.” It’s in
the aorist, a thing that is completed and done with. It is active, you decide to do it. And very important, this is a command.
Now you might say, “Wait a minute. This “epiteleo” is a
command? He is commanding him to perform this? I thought he couldn’t demand
in grace.” That’s true. He can’t. But here’s the
difference: This command is not wrong because it is a command for them to complete what they had freely
chosen to do previously. What Paul is saying, “The
Word of God has led you to the point of making a right decision. Now I, as your spiritual leader, command you
to get with what God has put upon your heart to perform.”
The Bible constantly does this. This is what is called in the book of James
“being doers of the Word and not only hearers.” What James is saying is that “God has led you
to a position of understanding of the Word, and now I command you to do it.” It is right to command people to do what God
has laid upon their hearts and directed them through the Word to do. That’s what Paul is doing here.
Salvation was planned in eternity past, but it was completed
later in time. So, you and I, for any plan that God leads us into at some point of our lives, should in time
be completed. It is wrong for you to start at a certain point in your life, and maybe you have started at some
point and said, “Someplace down the line, I’m going to have enough
money to finance this particular project in God’s vineyard.” This is perfectly in order. That’s
where you made your decision. Then the years have passed and you still have the desire to see this good thing
performed, but you have not done it. Therein you are in error. If
God has led you to a plan, He is also leading you in time to the
fulfillment of that plan. As God performs the
fulfillment of salvation, so we perform the fulfillment of very plan that He leads us into.
For these Corinthians, the plan to complete this offering,
which they were now to proceed to do. “Therefore
perform the doing of it, that as there was a readiness.” Now the word “readiness” in the
Greek is “prothumia.” This means a deep desire. There was a deep
desire on their part to perform this giving. This connotes a certain
eagerness. Just as there was once a willingness and an eagerness to perform, now he says, “Let there
be a willingness to do it.”
In our English Bibles the words “there was” are in italics,
meaning that they are not in the Greek. This is because the apostle Paul is saying this in
the Greek in a very strong and pungent way. What he is
saying actually is, “That as a readiness to will, so a
performance.” By dropping the verb, it makes it a stronger
impact that he wants them to get off and get moving from what they were
willing to do, to now what they are ready to be prepared to perform.
I don’t think we can fault many Christians in the circle of
our acquaintance who express a willingness and a desire to do something
for the Lord. Sometimes I hear some harsh remarks from some of you against somebody who is forever talking about
doing something—who is forever expressing a desire to perform something for the Lord and
never getting moving. The thing that we need
to do is to alert that person and to uphold him before the Lord, that
the good thing that God placed upon his heart should now be performed. The willingness should be converted into a
performance as well. That’s what Paul is saying here in verse 11. Perform the
doing, “as there was a readiness so that there may be a performance as well.” This is his purpose.
Now this performance needs to finish. That’s what the word “performance” here
literally means, to finish. This is the
Greek word “epiteleo, and it simply means “to finish.” Get on with the thing that you have
begun. Some Christians have a desire to
give but they never get on to completing it. That’s what he is calling upon these people to do.
He points out that their giving is to be “out of that which
ye have.” Literally, it’s “out of the having.” These Corinthians are to
give out of the resources that God in grace has provided to them. God is not asking you to make commitments to
His work out of what you do not currently possess. This is what is wrong about a church doing
pledges. Sometimes churches do an every-member campaign. A certain body of
men from the church will come around and knock on the door of every
church member, and they will say, “Now we are drawing up our church
budget and we would like to know how much you plan to give to underwrite this
budget.” They ask you to make a pledge. Now what do you have to do? You have to sit down and say, “I’m
going to project myself out here for the year before me, and I’m going to
say that I’m going to have that much and I’m going to give that much.”
The Bible says you have no right to do that. God only asks you to give out of that
paycheck that you have in hand. God asks you to give on the basis of what you have. For somebody to come along and ask you to give and
to commit yourself to giving on the basis of what you do not have is a sign that they are out
of line with the Word of God.
The question always arises, “Does God have a perfect plan?” Does
God in all things have a perfect plan? If God is perfect, His plans must
be perfect. Therefore, every plan that God has, and God does have a plan, and it includes all the facets of
life, including yours and mine. This means that God has a perfect plan for you and me in every respect that we are
related to Him and to other people.
That means therefore that God has a perfect marriage plan for you, for example. That’s what we
call your particular man or your particular woman. God has one particular person He intends for
you to marry. Now suppose that you come along and you marry somebody else’s right man. What have you done to the plan of God, which of
course God has taken into His plan also? Your volition has come along and you stepped over the bounds and you’ve taken
somebody else’s right man, and you’ve married that person. Now you have disrupted the relationships that God
has that were the best relationships in society. God then has a
secondary right man for that right woman. But you have stepped out of line over what is
God’s best and primary blessing.
Now the question comes up also, “Does God have a place where I should go to church?” If God has a
perfect plan, does He have a right church and a right pastor for me? The answer is, “Yes.”
He has one church and one pastor and that’s the only place you can go. A lot of
Christians have never really learned this. I really have great concern within me when I
listen to some Christians talk about churches, like they were visiting shoe
stores. “I go in this place and say, ‘Let me see your shoes.’ Yeah, I like
that style. I don’t like that. Well, I’m going to go down the street
here.” They act you can just shop around. Sometimes Christians even say, “I’m going to shop around for churches.
Well there are many questions that will have to be answered
to decide which is your right church and which is your right pastor. By the way, if you’re not in that right
church and right pastor, you’re done for. You have really done yourself in. Usually people leave the right church and the right
pastor because God is using that right church and right pastor to get across to them the
information that they need, and they resent it to high heaven. So, in their reaction, they go someplace else
where they can escape it. Then they become something. They get quite
involved and they become quite a star where they are. But don’t ever be deceived that once
they’ve left the right church and the right pastor that God is in any
substantial way using them further. Now you may not like
that, but you start reading through the Word of God and you start
taking into account the sovereignty and the plan of God and you will see that there is no other position than that.
Now there are many questions to answer who is the right one,
but I can tell you one way you can eliminate a lot of them: If you walk into a church and they are not
explaining the Word of God, if they are not giving people a chance to
learn doctrine, if they are not sheerly devoting themselves in a very rigid
way to teaching Bible doctrine service after service, as hateful as this is to
many people, and explaining it in understandable terms, as hateful as those
terms are to many people, you can eliminate that church. Now right away I know what you
thought of. You said, “Well, my goodness. On that basis I can look across this city and
the vast majority of churches are automatically eliminated as not possibly
being a church that God would lead a person to.” That’s right. You can look across the city and see how many
hundreds and hundreds of people are sitting in churches that are not God’s right church
for them, or God’s right pastor. You know that God is not
going to lead a person into a place where he is being given straw and
where he is being fed chaff and where his soul is being permitted to shrivel in
its spiritual expression. You know that God is not going to lead you into a place like that.
I’m sorry to say there are not many churches in this city (a
few) where you can sit down and learn the Word of God and come out
ahead spiritually. Now in your witnessing I
think you ought to alert people (other Christians) to that fact. I think you ought to alert people that God
has a right church and a right pastor, and that the first sign is that
that church and that pastor are teaching out doctrine. This
is going to be hard for most people to
understand, but after a while you might be able to bring them around to
where they know what you mean by “teaching,” and they will catch
on and they will be horrified to look at themselves and see what they’ve been in.
Some of you are sitting here this morning and you have
deep-seated feelings over what was once done to you when you sat in
churches where your emotions were played and where your mentality was ignored,
and the Word of God was never brought to you. You now look back and you say, “I sat in a
church where they preached the gospel all the time, and that’s all I heard.” I can tell by the way some of you talk that
you’re on the very verge of being bitter about it. You have a problem with the root of
bitterness because of the damage and what you were robbed of, buy at
least be grateful that you’re not still sitting there. You are the princes and princesses of God that have
been honored. Hundreds of God’s royalty are sitting this morning under chaff. You could do people
a great service by alerting them to that one sign of telling, “Is this my right
church?” And it would be value in just alerting people that there is a right place.
Now Paul says, “What I want you to give is out of what you
have.” If you hear a church that tells
you to give out of what you don’t have, you know that’s not
the place that God wants for you. It probably is a signal
of a lot of other things that are misconstrued. They are to give on what they have. The principle here is a percentage of your income,
as 1 Corinthians 16:2 says, and it is up to you to determine that percentage. You have to take into account your financial
responsibilities and meet them, but you also have to take into account
why you have those particular responsibilities. Use your possessions to complete God’s plan
that He has for you and your giving.
So, this verse says, “Now therefore also finish doing it in
order that just as a readiness to will, so a completion also of the
having.” Verse 12 says, “For if there be first a
willing mind, it is accepted according to that which a man has, and not
according to what he doesn’t have.” “For
if” is a first-class condition which means that these Corinthians
did have a willing mind to give. “If there be first”
means “to be present.” If there is
present, and there is, with you Corinthians…” The idea is to have something on hand. What did they have? They
had a willing mind, a “prothumia,” as in verse 11, this readiness.
They had a disposition to give. He says, “If you have this, it is
accepted.” The Greek word is “euprosdektos.” This simply
means “pleasing” or “acceptable.” It refers to a mind that’s willing to
give.
“According to that which a man has and not according to that
which he doesn’t have.” He’s acceptable if he has. He’s acceptable if he has
not. God says that if there is a willing mind, and you see again that God says if your mind is right through my
Word, and you have come to where you have a willing mind, you have a
readiness of disposition, then, he said, you’re accepted. If you have a mind which is willing to give, and God
in His providence has made you so poor that you can’t give, the very fact that you
have a mind which is willing to give counts with God. You receive as much blessing as the rich man who has
given the biggest gift imaginable. It is according to what you have, and not according to what you have not. Now
giving is acceptable. Whether we have the money to give or not, it’s the willingness that counts. So, if
you’re broke but you have a willing mind, then in effect you’ve given. This which is the giving from money to
doctrine in your soul. Giving without doctrine in the soul is like physical love without soul love coming first.
So, God measures our disposition to give according to a percentage
of what we have. This is like the widow’s mite. God looked at the rich men and
according to what they kept they were poor givers. God looked at the widow and according to what
she kept out of what she had, she was a splendid giver. A small gift, for that reason, may by
comparison with one’s positions be a much greater gift, indicating a
much greater willingness than somebody who gives a much larger gift. Your willingness to give is not reflected by
the size of your gift. It is by the size of your gift in comparison to what you have left over.
And God says, “Let there be first a willingness of mind, and then you are accepted whether you have anything or whether you don’t.”
Then in verses 13 through 15 Paul goes to another principle, the principle of equality. Here’s
the clarification that Paul wants to make. Verse 13 says, “I mean not that other men be
eased and you be burdened.” “I mean not” is a strong expression in the
Greek. “I do not want you to misunderstand me,” he is saying. “My
purpose in urging you to complete the Jerusalem relief fund:” literally, “not that there be relief and
ye burdened.” Again we have a sharp way
of presenting this, with the verb omitted, simply the pungent pointed
statement. Paul says, “Other men should not be eased.” This
“other” is the Greek word “allos.” That means “another
of the same kind.” So, he’s referring to Christians. He said, “I don’t mean that other
Christians, other believers—the ones in Jerusalem here in this context,
should be eased, should have relief, but you should be burdened. The word “burdened” here is the word
“thlipsis” that we met before. “Thlipsis”
was a burdening by pressures, by outward circumstances. He said,
“I’m not asking that you should have the circumstances that pressure you as a result of your giving.”
In other words, what Paul is saying is, “I’m not calling
upon you people to give to such an extent that you make yourself
destitute. Just because you Corinthians have money, God is not saying that you should give to such an extent
that the Jerusalem saints are made rich and you are made poor. For the collection is not that there is to be
relief for others and pressure for you.” While the Lord Jesus Christ came to make us rich, he
did not make Himself spiritually destitute so that He was of no help to sinners. Paul is not recommending that rich Corinthians
should make themselves destitute in order that the impoverished Jerusalem saints should be rich.
Sometimes people try to convey that idea. People who have money are always
under a certain attack, that they should be impoverishing themselves, that they
should be making themselves poor while others are being made rich. That isn’t what
the Bible means at all. Paul makes it very clear that I do not mean
that others should be eased and relieved and you should be burdened. But, he says, “… by an
equality,” in verse 14, “that now at this time your abundance may be a supply for
their want, that their abundant may be also a supply for your want, that there may be equality.”
Now what does he mean by “equality?” The rule in
dealing with one’s possessions is not to try to create equality in the amount of property that each
Christian possesses, but equal relief from the burden of want. What he is saying here is, “I want you to be
careful to create the condition that there is no Christian among you
who carries a burden of want—not that you make everybody equal in his
possessions.” For this reason he says, “At this time of
your abundance, you Corinthians are well off. The Jerusalem Christians are strapped with poverty.
That’s their want.” So, he says, “Here’s the nature of an
exchange: You take care of them now because the time may come when you may be in reversed roles, that you
will be strapped with poverty under the pressures of the Roman government as
the Macedonian churches were, and that the Jerusalem saints will be in a
position to share out of what they have to take care of your needs so that you
are not burdened with want. This may also imply of course that the Jerusalem Christians were the source of spiritual
blessing to them, and to sustain that church was very important.
This is another point of being in your right church. Do you realize what it means
if God says this is your right church and you take your finances and put it someplace
else? That’s a travesty. That’s spiritual adultery. God judges severely for that. This
is taking your loyalty and your finances and your support from the place that God says, “This is the place
that’s doing the job. This is the place that I want
you to sustain,” and you take it and give it to someplace else? That is a travesty. That’s
grotesque. This is exactly what happens when we ignore
the fact that God has placed us in a particular right place. So, there may be implied here to these
Corinthians, “Your financial support of the Jerusalem ministry is
very strategic, for out of it flow our basic spiritual well-being, the basic
spiritual blessings that have been ours. So, we’re going to equalize with our wealth
their need, and they in turn our spiritual blessing.”
So, each of these has an abundance. Each of these has a want. He says, “But by an equality that now at this
time your abundance for their want, their abundance also for your want,
that there may be equality.” The goal of Paul’s
recommendation is that there come an equal freedom from want.
This is not a consideration for Christian communism. I think we should
understand very clearly that the Bible does not promote communal concepts. The Bible says that what you have is your own
to do with as you choose. Acts 5:4 says, “While it remained (concerning
the property which Ananias and Sapphira sold) was it not thine own, and
after it was sold was it not in thine own power?” The Bible always recognizes the law of private
property. Guidance for our voluntary use of what we
possess comes to us through the Word and through the filling of the Holy Spirit.
Now all who are in want are to be taken care of. This is a work of mercy
whether a person is a Christian or not, the Bible says we are to be concerned for people who
are in material want. Nevertheless, the bible also says that the people
who get your first claim are the Christians. Galatians 6:10 says, “As we have
therefore opportunity, let us do good unto all men, especially unto them who are
the household of faith. For this reason I think it is legitimate for you as a Christian, who have many demands
upon your giving by social agencies, for you to stop and say to yourselves,
“Now just a minute. There is this vast world of unbelievers out here. They have
money. What will they use their money for? For the sustaining of God’s
work to advance spiritual cause? Never. But they will use it for social areas of
need. They will use it for human good instigation. Therefore, I think it is
well for you as believers to say, “We let the world support and
finance the areas that the world promotes, out of which the world can draw money,
and we as believers put our money into the work of the Lord that the unbeliever
will not put his money into.
Now this is good for the unbeliever because the Bible says
that you are the salt of the earth. This nation is preserved as long as there are a maximum number of believers
who are oriented to God’s ways and God’s morality. When that comes to an end, this nation is through,
and the community chest and everything else goes down the line. Paul’s recommendation is to take care of
believers above anybody else and to take care of them in a way that provides for lasting eternal benefits.
However, the Word of God also makes it clear that if you
happen to be a person who is in need, and a poor person, you are not to
look and lean upon the church members who are well off to carry you through.
2 Thessalonians 3:10 says, “For even when we
were with you, this we commanded you: that if any would not work, neither should he eat. For we hear that there are some that walk
among you disorderly, working not at all, but are busybodies. Now them are as such we command and exhort by
our Lord Jesus Christ that with quietness they work and eat their own
bread.” The United States of America could learn an awful
lot from these principles of doctrine relative to the handling of
material things. If you’re poor, don’t
lean on the Christians in your assembly and decide you’re going to slide
along and serve the Lord and let others provide for you, but earn your own bread
and eat it in the quietness of what God has provided. These biblical principles would prevent both idleness and want.
So, Paul says, “By an equating at the present time, your
abundance to their lack, that also their abundance may be come to your
lack in order that there may become an equality.”
Manna
The last verse then gives us an illustration of this
equality that Paul is trying to speak of so no believer is in want: “As it is written, he that had gathered
much had nothing over. He that had gathered little had no lack.” This is a quote
from Exodus 16:18. “As it is written” refers
to the Scriptures of the Old Testament which stand written, and the
reality of this revelation. “Had gathered much” is
literally “the one much” is the idea. They had gathered this manna.
Every morning they went out and gathered it. Some gathered much. But
they found that when they gathered much they had nothing left over. It is said
with the strongest Greek negative, this word “ouk.” That’s the strongest negative and it
says that they didn’t have anything left over, with never an exception. “He that had gathered much had nothing
over.” On the other hand, the one who had gathered little discovered that he had no lack. He still have plenty for his needs.
What is God telling us? It’s telling us that God said, “I’m going to supply for you Jews an omer
measure of manna for everybody in the camp. All you have to do is go out and gather it. But the book of Exodus tells it that they
were to go out and gather it according to their eating. Their eating is their capacity. God said, “Here is the eating.
Go out and gather according to your capacity.” So, every morning they would hustle out of
their tent. The manna would come down every day except on the Sabbath day (Exodus 16:4-5, 22-27). They couldn’t keep it because if they
kept it over to the next day it became odorous and wormy. On Friday they had to gather double to cover
the Sabbath and that didn’t spoil.
This is an illustration of doctrine. Our manna is the Word of God and we have to
gather it daily for our spiritual lives. The Lord has supplied us this manna in His Word, the
means for us to learn it, the teachers for us to be instructed with, and everything
that is necessary with a human living and God the Holy Spirit in order to
provide what we need. As we look into the book of Exodus we find that those who gathered much manna had no more than
those who gathered little because each gathered according to his eating; that is, his
capacity. Under the law of equality, God always matches your capacity. The person
who seems to have greater spiritual blessings, greater joys, greater
satisfactions, and greater victories in his life is the Christian who has greater
capacity. He is the believer who’s taking in doctrine. He’s the reader
of the Word. He’s the one who’s analyzing and
putting together and studying, and his capacity is developing.
Every one of us as believers has an equal position in Christ. We are all capable of the full
spiritual experiences but some of us are very puny, and some of us have
a very great capacity. Yet God wants to give us all fantastic spiritual blessings, and yet many of us simply lack the
capacity for life. So, we stink and we are wormy. The manna had to be used in the
right way (Exodus 16:19-20). If you hoarded it overnight, it spoiled. And
doctrine has to be used in the right way if it’s to be beneficial. You cannot sustain your physical life on past
food, and you cannot sustain your spiritual life on past food. Some of us have not learned that. Some of us have not learned that the
spirituality maturity structure of our souls can come to a magnificent
level of development, and yet like any building it deteriorates. We begin to retrogress in our spiritual
lives. The common word for that is back-sliding. That doesn’t say very
much, but what happens is we start going backwards because we stop taking in the Word.
Every morning the manna melted under the sun (Exodus 16:21),
and only doctrine which is absorbed will remain for our use. The manna that was in the tent was there for
eating. The character who said, “Oh, I’m
going to sleep in late this morning and I’ll collect my manna a
little later.” He hopped out of bread all hungry and ready
for breakfast and went out and the manna was gone because as soon as
the sun came up it melted. When you get under the pressures of life, and you and I get under the prosperities of
life, that’s when we need the manna of doctrine. If
you don’t have it then, my dear friend, you’re not going to
get it. It’s too late for you to run out.
This is why people come to pastors and say, “I want
counseling.” What do they mean? “I want you to make some decisions for
me because I haven’t informed myself on the Word so I don’t
know what to do here.” They’re trying to get advice from you on the
basis of doctrine that they lack, instead of having prepared themselves
with the Word. Manna which is un-gathered is in the Bible as doctrine and it’s
of no use to us whatsoever. It was interesting that the manna tasted good
to some. Exodus 16:31 says that to some it was like honey, but Numbers 21:5 says that some of them loathed it.
Did you ever notice that about doctrine? Some people love it. Some people loathed it. But
you don’t know that. You have to be in my position to find how
people loathe doctrine—to know what abuse you can take for the
fact that you’re presenting the Word better than you ever presented it before, and with
deeper insights than ever before, and it has a better cutting edge than ever
before. Like Paul says, the closer we get to that reality the more you despise the agents that are bringing
it. It’s an old story.
Manna was God’s grace provision (Exodus 16:2-4). People complained that
they didn’t have anything to eat so God provided them with it. He kept it
coming on the basis of His character. The rejection of manna resulted in divine
discipline (Numbers 21:5-6). A Christian who rejects the Word of God falls from
grace (Galatians 5:4). He is failing in grace (Hebrews 12:15).
Dr. John E. Danish, 1971
Back to the Basic Bible Doctrine index
Back to the Bible Questions index
|